Case Study 3: Assessing Learning and Exchanging Feedback

Connecting Feedback, Peer Review, and Digital Tools for Learning

Contextual Background

As a Specialist Technician at London College of Fashion, I deliver technical workshops across various courses within the School of Media and Communication. These workshops have defined learning outcomes but do not directly impact on students’ grades. This can affect engagement, with some students fully committed, while others see less value in participating. In addition, the limited insight into students’ prior work and course requirements makes it difficult to provide meaningful and targeted feedback. A key concern is to ensure that formative feedback is recognised as an essential part of student learning while bridging the gap between technical and academic development.

I currently provide real-time, hands-on guidance during workshops to support skill refinement and experimentation. This aligns with Nicol and Macfarlane-Dick’s (2006) principles of good feedback practice, particularly in fostering self-regulation. However, this feedback lacks structure and reflection, making it difficult for students to link their technical progress to broader academic goals. Furthermore, the absence of technical staff in formal assessment creates a disconnect between practical learning and its academic recognition. While students value the informal workshop environment, structured feedback mechanisms could help them to articulate their technical development more effectively (Addison, 2014).

Moving Forward

Strengthening structured feedback frameworks – Providing structured feedback rubrics within workshops could ensure that feedback is clear, consistent with unit learning outcomes and promotes self-reflection (Nicol & Macfarlane-Dick, 2006). By explicitly linking technical learning to academic progression, students can better understand how their skills contribute to their overall development.

Increasing collaboration with academic staff – Closer collaboration with course tutors could improve the integration of technical and theoretical learning. Nicol and Macfarlane-Dick (2006) emphasise the importance of clarifying learning expectations, which could be achieved by aligning workshop feedback with academic assessment criteria. Addison (2014) also criticises rigid learning outcomes in creative education and suggests that a more negotiated approach to assessment could improve student learning.

Promoting peer review and collaborative learning – Encouraging students to engage in structured peer feedback could help them to critically reflect on their progress, gain diverse perspectives and develop self-assessment skills. The ‘Make the Grade’ strategy (Finnigan, n.d.) suggests that increasing student engagement with assessment criteria could reduce repetition and improve performance. Incorporating peer feedback into workshops may also help students to better understand the assessment criteria in an interactive way.

Maximising blended learning and digital feedback – Blended learning and asynchronous resources are already available, but their role in supporting formative feedback could be enhanced. Regular updates, structured prompts for reflection and interactive elements such as self-assessment checklists can improve student engagement (Nicol & Macfarlane-Dick, 2006). Digital feedback should encourage dialogue rather than serve as one-way communication to ensure that students actively engage with feedback rather than passively receive it.

Creating a reflective culture – Encouraging students to document their technical progress in journals, visual blogs, or process logs such as Miro Boards and Padlet can help them connect experimentation to conceptual development. Reflection is a key principle in formative assessment (Nicol & Macfarlane-Dick, 2006) and could provide a more flexible approach that acknowledges the iterative nature of creative practice (Addison, 2014).

Advocating for inclusion in assessment conversations – Technical learning plays a crucial role in creative disciplines, yet technical staff are excluded from assessment discussions. Working with academic teams to include technical learning in assessment processes could create a more holistic approach to student assessment. Addison (2014) argues for a move beyond performative learning outcomes towards a model that values emergent and situated knowledge. Furthermore, Nicol and Macfarlane-Dick (2006) emphasise the role of feedback in clarifying performance expectations — an area that technical staff could contribute to by providing insights into students’ engagement with practical learning.

References

Addison, N. (2014) Doubting Learning Outcomes in Higher Education Contexts: From Performativity Towards Emergence and Negotiation. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 33(3), pp. 313–325.

Finnigan, T. (n.d.) Make the Grade. University of Derby PReSS Pack.

Nicol, D.J. and Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006) Formative Assessment and Self-Regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), pp. 199–218.

Observation of my teaching practice by my tutor

(Part Two & Three: Feedback & Reflection)

Kwame’s feedback was a thoughtful and encouraging reflection on my teaching practice, highlighting both strengths and areas for further development. His observations reassured me that my approach is supporting students in meaningful ways, particularly in developing their portfolios and encouraging deeper engagement with their creative direction.

It was great to hear that my teaching not only provides technical support but also encourages students to critically evaluate the structure of their work. Kwame’s appreciation for how I balance technical considerations — such as colour theory, print formats, and sequencing — with creative intentions was particularly gratifying. I find his suggestion to develop a separate lesson on colour theory for photographers very valuable and will definitely explore further, as it would provide students with a more solid foundation in industry-relevant presentation techniques.

I also appreciate Kwame’s comments on my ability to create a supportive and empathetic learning environment. He noted that my approach encourages students to move confidently in different directions, which emphasises my commitment to student-led instruction. His comments on my calm manner and ability to adapt to students’ perspectives confirmed that my approach helps to build their confidence in their creative choices.

His feedback on accessibility and adaptability was also valuable. He acknowledged how I adapted my approach to ensure all students were included and highlighted the one-to-one support I provided to a student without a laptop as an example of inclusive pedagogy. This reinforced my belief that flexibility is essential in practical, skills-based teaching.

Thank you very much, Kwame! 

Observation of my teaching practice by a peer (Part Three: Reflection)

Ian’s feedback provided a valuable perspective on my teaching approach, highlighting both strengths and areas for further development. It was reassuring to hear that the session felt structured and effective, that students were actively engaging and producing work that met industry standards. Dealing with lateness was a challenge that I had anticipated, and I am glad that my approach helped to keep disruption to a minimum. His comments on the balance between the workshop and the concurrent one-to-one tutorials were also encouraging — it can be difficult to balance both, but it was great to have the workshop ran smoothly.

One of the key takeaways from Ian’s notes was the importance of prompting more student responses before offering explanations. Ian pointed out moments where I could have encouraged students to analyse visual elements on their own instead of immediately giving answers. More active participation in these situations could help students engage more deeply with the material and build their confidence in discussing visual concepts.

His feedback on cultural considerations in composition techniques was particularly insightful. The observation that reading direction influences composition and design, and that this varies from culture to culture is something I to consider more in future discussions during the workshop. His comment about L2 speakers and pronunciation difficulties was also useful — I had not previously considered how emphasising certain words can improve engagement and communication.

The structure of the lesson seemed to work well, and the use of previous student work to demonstrate real-life applications was effective in reinforcing key concepts. In the future, I will continue to refine my approach and ensure that students are more actively involved in the discussions while maintaining a structured and professional learning environment. This is also part of my ongoing case study research where I am investigating how different teaching methods impact on student engagement and learning outcomes.

Overall, Ian’s feedback was very helpful, and I will take these points into consideration when developing workshops.

Case Study 2: Planning and Teaching for Effective Learning

Bridging Theory and Practice in Student Learning

Contextual Background

As a Specialist Technician in Photography at London College of Fashion, I design and deliver technical workshops that support BA and MA students in developing both conceptual understanding and technical proficiency. A key challenge in my teaching practice is ensuring that students effectively integrate technical skills with creative decision-making. Some students excel in hands-on tasks but struggle to articulate their choices conceptually, while others grasp theoretical concepts but lack confidence in executing practical work. To address this, I am refining my workshop structure, feedback mechanisms, and reflective exercises to create a more balanced learning experience and improve student outcomes.

I currently deliver technical workshops as part of the course units and unit learning outcomes, but there is often a disconnect between practical learning and the wider course objectives, limiting students’ ability to develop transferable skills. While I have already introduced reflective discussions and project-based learning, I plan to refine these methods to ensure deeper engagement and better professional preparation.

Moving Forward

Refining teaching practices for impactful learning 

To improve student learning outcomes, I am further exploring the following strategies:

Integrated workshop design – Working closely with academic staff, I will improve workshops to better align with course learning outcomes and allow students to immediately apply technical knowledge in meaningful ways. This will strengthen the link between technical skills development and creative intentions.

Structured reflection and critical evaluation – I will further integrate structured journaling and guided peer critiques to help students articulate their technical decisions and reflect on their creative processes. Drawing from the creative process model (Bremmer, Heijnen & Haanstra, 2024), this approach emphasises reflection at every stageof orientation, research, execution and evaluation, supporting iterative learning.

Project-based and inquiry-led learning – Revising project assignments with explicit problem-solving elements will encourage students to consider how technical skills support artistic and industry-specific outcomes. This refinement fosters deeper engagement by mirroring professional workflows and encouraging students to take ownership of their learning.

Collaborative and peer-led learning –Refining peer review sessions with structured prompts will help students engage more critically with their own work and that of others. This fosters a more inclusive learning environment where students build confidence in their technical and conceptual skills (Ross & Leewis, 2022).

Real World Contextualisation –– Integrating live case studies and professional project deconstructions into workshops will expose students to industry-level decision-making processes. By analysing professional works step-by-step—examining the conceptual development, technical choices, and problem-solving strategies—students can gain a deeper understanding of how technical skills translate into creative and professional outcomes. 

References

Bremmer, M., Heijnen, E. & Haanstra, F. (2024) ‘Wicked Arts Education—Designing Creative Programmes‘. Amsterdam: Valiz.


Ross, S. L. & Leewis, L. (2022) ‘Home Sweet Home: Achieving Belonging and Engagement in Online Learning Spaces’, Spark: UAL Creative Teaching and Learning Journal, 5(1), pp. 71-79.

Additional Reading

Sams, C. (2016) ‘How Do Art and Design Technicians Conceive of Their Role in Higher Education?’, Spark: UAL Creative Teaching and Learning Journal, 1(2), pp. 62-69.

Boud, D., Keogh, R. and Walker, D. (2013) Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning, pp. 91-99

Observation of my teaching practice by a peer (Part Two: Observer’s notes)

Part Two: Observer’s notes, Ian Holmes

Architecture and Delivery 

I was able to observe the initial briefing and teaching input element (10-11:30 AM) as well as the final student collaboratively produced work at the end of the whole day workshop (16:30-17:00). 

The initial part of the session took place in a teaching space separated from the ‘open heart’ space by pillars – there were a variety of example objects on the table where the students were sitting that could then be used in the later photography workshop. The proximity to the objects set a strong haptic element to the class – they were within reach of the learners and would later be handled in the workshop in the design of the photographs. 

As you had anticipated – some students arrived late – however there were 5 by 10:10 with one more arriving at 10:16 – and you managed this first 15 minutes of the class time well as an effective check in for the students. You have a relaxed manner with the group and there is a good rapport between you and the learners – “How’s the unit going?” – and the beginning of the lesson served well as an opportunity for students to talk through some ideas. 

You made clear the Learning Outcomes for the session – ‘to create a fashion editorial piece’ – “to industry standard” (product) and to “work collaboratively” – and develop “studio photography skills” (process). 

Students sat at table with objects facing the screen – where the slide deck was presented – you sat behind them to operate the slides remotely. There was a moment where some students (those who were directly between yourself and the screen) were not sure where they should be looking, however, you later moved round so that you and the screen were in the same frame for the students. At this point you began to elicit from students – “where do we see products?” You then provided the analysis of the purpose of such representations of products in advertising – “to attract the viewer – to sell the product” – however, maybe this could have been a further opportunity to elicit from them by asking – ‘what is the purpose of these images/representations?’ 

You then presented an example of how a professional has created a narrative with photography of a product – you suggested that the photographs had “a mediterranean feel – if that makes sense?” – Maybe you could have asked the students if they could identify any elements that suggest this. There was an interesting point about body parts being considered as still life. Another example where you talked helped explain the playful elements – the bold colours – the objects – the teeth – the tie as a tongue, etc. Was clear, however I thought that this could have been another opportunity to elicit some language from the learners what they could see in the images that created the playful effect/ feeling. In addition, it may have been useful to focus on the word tongue (especially for L2 speakers of English) – this is an example of difficult spelling and pronunciation relationship (obviously I’m looking at this from a Language Teaching perspective, but I think sometimes highlighting features like this can give L2 learners more confidence in actually using the words to refer to objects (essential to effective collaborative communication) – rather than just avoiding them. 

The section on composition techniques was effective in helping the learners to understand how this work in practice – through the examples you showed and your explanations. This was especially well anticipated as one of the students remarked that she was not sure about ‘the rule of thirds’ and your demonstration using examples provided an excellent understanding for this learner – and the group. The student asking for examples and your response is very useful for those students who remain silent – and probably have the same questions. The insights gained for the students about the Fibunaci pattern and the composition of text and images on the cover of magazines – Dior vs Hello was very interesting and useful – as was the point about how we read left to right affects the choices of these compositions – although I thought it may have been a good opportunity to point out the cultural specificity of this idea – in Arabic culture the direction of reading is right to left. 

Whilst I felt that the analysis of each example technique was clear – the initial thumbnails for each were a little bit small to read the text and see the detail in the sketch/images, maybe this could have been blown up a bit. 

I feel that you gave some very good advice about how to approach the tasks – talking about your own practice: “In my personal work – I find it very useful” – and in reference to the techniques – “It’s a guide – not a rule.”

Setting music for when the collaborative task began was effective in setting the creative workshop focus mode for the group.  

Overall, I feel that the session was well managed – even with some noise disturbance and the tutorials that were going on in the corridor at the same time. You were able to provide real insights into how professional photography works and set up the collaborative task for the day. Using the example of a previous students work – with which they gained professional work – was great at showing the real-world application of the skills that the learners were developing in practice. 

At the end of the presentation section, you brought the objects into focus and this was effective in making the ideas that you had presented on the screen real (and haptic), you clearly set the agenda for the rest of the day’s workshop and provided advice about how to assign roles – decide on the product and think about the brand identity and narrative you want to tell – and effectively work collaboratively towards producing the finished work. 

Achieved Goals

In the final presentation of the project at the end of the day it was evident that to had met the Key learning outcomes for this workshop through the development of students’ ability to work collaboratively in groups learners were able to produce work that meets industry standards. In this process they were also able to gain essential collaboration and studio photography skills.

You were then able to provide your expert analysis of the work produced as well as provide an opportunity for learners to reflect on the process – “what was the story/narrative?” – “what was the concept” behind what students were trying to achieve – “what would you have done differently?”

It was interesting to see how the examples that you used at the beginning ultimately informed the work the learners produced at the end of the day.  

Summary 

I felt that this was a very cohesive and valuable practical R&D lesson for your learners – having a whole day workshop for them to collaboratively work together and apply some the techniques that you had taught them. Some of the students were talking about how useful they had found the workshop and how much they had learned through participating in it. 

In response to the key issues you asked me to look at:

Late attendance can sometimes be disruptive.

You were able to manage this and integrate late arrivals 

The workshop runs alongside 1-to-1 tutorials with their tutor, which can make it challenging for students to fully commit to the session. As a result, it can be difficult for them to stay motivated, attentive, and work efficiently within their group or team.

Again – you managed this as best you could – the students, the other teachers and you working together to achieve multiple tasks at the same time – in a professional manner

Space is also an issue, particularly during deadlines and especially since moving to EB.

Despite some noise – you were able to manage this without having to raise your voice too much 

Some points to consider re eliciting from students – maybe think about more opportunities to get them to suggest the answers to potential questions before giving them all the information – even if they don’t know the answer they will be engaged and thinking about the content information. I feel that you have the instinct as teacher/technician instructor to do this – as you demonstrated, but this is something that I have learned to do more myself – even if half the time I get no response – at least I feel that I am drawing their cognition rather than them waiting for me to provide completely new information/ thinking for them. 

Observation of my teaching practice by a peer (Part One: Observee’s notes)

Part One (provided to the observer, Ian Holmes)

What is the context of this session/artefact within the curriculum?

This session is part of a series of industry classes for MA Fashion Photography (Year 1). It is one of the technical workshops within the ‘New Iterations in Fashion Photography’ unit. This unit is designed to foster a deep and integrated engagement with both theory and practice, leading towards a more self-directed and individualised research and development phase in the course.

How long have you been working with this group and in what capacity?

Since the beginning of the academic year. I am one of their specialist technicians, delivering inductions and technical workshops, contributing to their unit briefs, and providing support through 1-to-1 tutorials.

What are the intended or expected learning outcomes?

Key learning outcomes for this workshop include developing students’ ability to work collaboratively in groups to produce work that meets industry standards. They will also gain essential collaboration and studio photography skills.

What are the anticipated outputs (anything students will make/do)?

In this workshop, students will work together to produce a series of images or a single image based on the given brief. They will be provided with the necessary products, accessories, and props to create a fashion editorial piece.

Are there potential difficulties or specific areas of concern?

  • Late attendance can sometimes be disruptive.
  • The workshop runs alongside 1-to-1 tutorials with their tutor, which can make it challenging for students to fully commit to the session. As a result, it can be difficult for them to stay motivated, attentive, and work efficiently within their group or team.
  • Space is also an issue, particularly during deadlines and especially since moving to EB.

How will students be informed of the observation/review?

I will send students a reminder email a few days in advance to inform them of the observation. I will also introduce the observer in class.

What would you particularly like feedback on?

Any feedback will be greatly appreciated.
Feedback on the challenges mentioned above would also be helpful.

How will feedback be exchanged?

Through this form and, if possible, through an in-person conversation.

Dried Gourd Art in Cypriot Traditional Culture: A Reflection on Microteaching

Introduction and Planning

When planning my microteaching session, I knew I wanted to focus on an object that held cultural, historical, and personal significance. The dried gourd, or “koloji” as we call it in Cyprus, was an obvious choice. It’s something I grew up around but also something I lost touch with over time.

My goal was to create an engaging session that wasn’t just about delivering information but also about inviting discussion, storytelling, and hands-on interaction. I structured it around an inquiry-based approach—starting with an object and encouraging participants to explore its possible uses before revealing its history and craftsmanship. I wanted this to be a moment of shared curiosity, rather than just me talking at the group.

Presentation Structure

I started by showing the class a dried gourd and asked them to guess what it was used for and what it was made of. This led to an interesting mix of responses—some people recognised it it is a dried vegetable, while others had no idea what it was. Once I introduced its history and role in Cypriot culture, I shared my personal connection to it.

I talked about my grandparents, who were displaced after the 1974 war, and how they relied on the land for survival. My grandad used to grow and carve gourds, but none of his work was kept, which always felt like a missing link in my heritage. That’s why, when I randomly found a Cypriot-carved gourd in a vintage shop near King’s Cross, it felt like stumbling upon a lost piece of my family’s history.

From there, I moved on to the practical uses of gourds—how they were used for storing liquids, as musical instruments, and as household tools, and in decorative arts. I explained the different crafting techniques, from carving and burning to painting and varnishing, drawing connections to other folk traditions across the world. To make it more interactive, I asked participants to design their own patterns, almost like creating a family crest.

Feedback and Reflection

The response was really positive. People appreciated the mix of personal storytelling and historical context. The hands-on activity worked well, sparking discussions about cultural preservation, sustainable materials, and folk crafts in contemporary design. Some participants even started sharing their own experiences with traditional crafts from their backgrounds, which made the session feel more like a collective exploration rather than a one-way presentation.

If I were to do it again, I’d possibly allow more time for the design activity or even bring in a real dried gourd for people to handle. I also realised that I could have expanded more on the sustainability aspect—how these objects, made from a natural, biodegradable material, fit into today’s conversations about eco-friendly design.

Conclusion

Reflecting on this microteaching session, I can see how objects carry more than just functional value—they hold stories, identities, and connections to the past. The gourd, something I initially saw as a relic from my childhood, became a tool for wider discussions on heritage, sustainability, and craftsmanship.

This session reinforced the power of using tangible objects in education. It’s one thing to read about a tradition, but it’s another to interact with an object, to consider its textures, uses, and meanings. That’s something I’ll definitely take forward in my teaching—finding ways to make learning a more sensory and personal experience.

References:

Hardie, K. (2015) Innovative pedagogies series: Wow: The power of objects in object-based learning and teaching. Arts University Bournemouth.

Heartland of Legends – Kolotzia: Get Creative with Dry Gourds. Available at: https://heartlandoflegends.com/kolotzia-get-creative-with-dry-gourds/ (Accessed: 26 January 2025)

Cypriot Kitchen – Kolotzi. Available at: https://cyfoodmuseum.wixsite.com/cypriot-kitchen/kolotzi-en (Accessed: 26 January 2025)

Reflection – The Self in Higher Education: Narrative as Pedagogic Practice

In developing my teaching practice at UAL, I am drawn to these ideas of self-reflexivity and narrative as research. The pedagogic challenge lies in fostering spaces where students can construct meaning through both individual introspection and communal exchange. As arts educators, we navigate the balance between structured knowledge and creative exploration, shaping learning environments that honour both accuracy and the generative potential of storytelling.

A key theme in the text is self as subject-matter, where the educator’s personal and professional identities merge through storytelling. Trish Osler reflects on the fragmented roles of artist, researcher, and teacher, noting how they merge in fleeting moments: “If the symbiosis we hope for can be felt in moments…” This tension between roles is a familiar challenge in higher education, where time and institutional structures often limit personal creative practice. Isabelle Guillard extends this idea, situating pedagogy within an ecological awareness: “I am constantly reflecting upon my actions at the personal and super personal level.” This suggests that teaching is not static but an evolving process of self-examination and relational learning.

Arianna Garcia-Fialdini’s research validates artistic inquiry as a method for exploring immigrant identity. Her work highlights how storytelling can be a means of reclaiming agency and forming connections within a community. This aligns with the workshop’s emphasis on understanding students’ diverse needs, particularly in institutions like UAL, where international and diasporic perspectives shape the student body. Sandrine Côté’s narrative, which explores generational storytelling, resonated deeply. Her reflections on inherited narratives and objects forming parts of identity highlight how material culture can serve as an anchor for memory and belonging.

A recurring question in the text is the balance between accuracy and storytelling in education. Sandrine’s work raises questions about embellishment—how much artistic license is permissible in shaping pedagogic narratives? This tension is relevant in higher education, where conventional research methods prioritise factual precision, often at the expense of emotional or cultural truth. The text suggests that narrative-based research operates in the intermezzo—a space between personal history and collective meaning-making. This aligns with heuristic phenomenology, where knowledge emerges through lived experience rather than objective observation.

The fifth narrative in the text emerges through threadscape, where individual stories intertwine to create a broader shared experience. This reflects the role of observation in teaching: learning does not happen in isolation but through entangled dialogues between self, community, and context. Teaching becomes an act of echolocation—a way of positioning oneself in relation to others through storytelling and shared inquiry.

Reading Reference:

Osler, A., Sibley, J., Canning, C., and McDonald, A., 2019. Storying the self as pedagogic practice. Journal of Writing in Creative Practice, 12(1-2), pp.109-124